up home page mail me! Add to Technorati favourites bottom

Add a comment

French German version Spanish version Italian version

header image

twilight: a review

twilight-cover.jpgi teach english at a high school with 2,000+ students. i love reading. i love seeing students read. i love reading to my students and encouraging them to read on their own.

so when i saw dozens of copies of the book Twilight floating around my school, and heard that the school library can’t keep any of it’s copies in stock, and that it is hopelessly on backorder for months and months to come, i was excited. i picked up the first volume at sam’s club 2 weeks ago, then found the next three books at a used bookstore for $5 each! woo-hoo!!

i knew i wasn’t going to be reading classical literature, but i was expecting something riveting and gripping (ala the golden compass / dark materials trilogy or harry potter) – something with a semi-universal appeal and writing that was clear, crisp, and moved along quickly.

i’m disappointed to tell you that it is none of those things.

it’s a love story, the central character being a teenage white girl living in a small town in washington state. the love interest? a “teenage” white vampire boy attending the same school. bella falls hard for edward and through the story, learns about his differences and is unconcerned. edward tries hard to push her away, and the ensuing “getting to know you” period is predictable.

the story itself isn’t awful, but the writing is. 230+ pages of repetitive descriptions of facial expressions (almost all of them “smirk” or some form of this, “smoldering” and “fierce”), ways of laughing (“chuckle”), gripping, and retorting – overused, overdescribed, and maddeningly unimaginative after the second or third use of the same adjective / adverb.

around page 230 the plot FINALLY throws a twist you can’t see coming. the descriptors finally take a backseat as the action starts up and doesn’t let up until the end. by then, however, it was too late. i was bored and hypersensitive to her choice of words and writing style. the ending was predictable, unrealistic, and trite.

my final vote: thumbs down.

let’s be fair, though. i’m pushing 40 years old. i’m a dude. i love reading. it’s not written for me. i understand that.

so let’s do this:
if you’re a white, teenage, suburban girl: this book is for YOU! go for it! read it and love it!!
if you’re a dude of any race, creed, or socio-economic makeup: RUN!! GET AWAY!!!

now, does anyone want to buy my four copies of this 4-book set?

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

  1.   variation on the ABC game — rustypants speaks on
    June 20th, 2009 1:00 pm
    # 1

    [...] could be done with that ghastly “Twilight” series and/or the movie, or a TV show, [...]

  2. Steph Stauter on
    October 27th, 2008 3:36 pm
    # 2

    Hey Scott,

    I liked Twilight, although the whole “icy cold body”/”smoldering eyes” thing did start getting old by the end. Trust me that the books get better and there are some twists that you don’t see coming just from reading the first book. I think the writing gets better too. Just try reading the next one and if you still hate it then it’s probably not worth reading any more.

    Steph

  3. Moldy-Wan ~;-) on
    October 20th, 2008 7:17 pm
    # 3

    I have seen some trash published in my day that left me wondering “what in the world was the publisher’s editor-in-chief thinking when he accepted this crap!!?”

    Publisher’s Weekly called Twilight a “‘riveting first novel, equal parts suspense and romance.’ Ages 12-up.”

    “Riveting?” As your review states and PW notes, it is written for tweens & teens. Kind of sad, I think. At that age, kids should be offered quality writing to help them with their language and cognitive skills. Most especially their cognitive skills. Oh well. Maybe Little, Brown had a quota to fill a needed market. It’s still sad. It’s like picking up the New Haven Register newspaper (in Connecticut), reading it from front to back and finding more than 30 spelling and grammar errors that demonstrate that the reporters use an automated spell-check and did not bother to review to see if the words chosen were actually the right ones and that the newspaper obviously no longer employs copy editors or fact checkers.

    Carl Sagan used to call things like that “the dumbing down of America.”
    L&K,
    Moldy-Wan ~;-)

Leave your feedback

(name)

(email)

(website)